What’s a crossover? I’ve all the time understood the definition to be “SUV journey top with unibody building” — muddy in circumstances just like the GLA and Crosstrek, certain, however comparatively constant in any other case. Others will say that crossovers need to occupy the center floor between small vehicles and massive SUVs, basing the definition on dimension reasonably than building. Neither definition, crucially, is predicated on the car’s form.
Daniele Calonaci, head of Jeep design for Europe, the Center East, and Africa, disagrees. Speaking with Top Gear, Calonaci drew two distinct camps of automotive design: “Crossover” and “Boxy,” claiming the seven-slat grille would all the time land firmly within the latter. However that is an odd dichotomy to put out — haven’t crossovers all the time been each?
I don’t find out about you, however I’d name the first-generation Toyota Rav4 “fairly boxy.” Relative to the remainder of rounded-off ‘90s styling, that is as sq. because it will get. It’s downright cubic. Which, really, brings me to a different level.
Bear in mind the Nissan Dice? A crossover named exactly for its boxy styling? Does this one rely as “not a crossover,” or “not boxy”? It certain looks as if each to me.
How concerning the Scion xB? Slab sides, flat entrance and rear ends, it’s a whole sq. on wheels. Take a look at the Kia Soul, the Honda Pilot, there are boxy crossovers all over the place. You don’t want to select one or the opposite.
It’s a nitpick, certain, as a result of I feel the brand new Avenger really seems fairly nice. But it surely’s divorcing itself from the crossover identify, pretending to be one thing it’s not in service of styling. Why not make the assertion that crossovers can be boxy, aggressive, and off-road styled?